Costner Cinema Chat

A site in which Kevin Costner's movies are discussed

Wednesday, July 13, 2005

Dragonfly script

Last week, the Los Angeles Times had an article about script doctors; not only do directors have them, but actors and actresses do, too. But I digress. Part of the article talks about Tom Shadyac. Shadyac is known for very loud, obnoxious and successful comedies, usually with Jim Carrey. He has a rewrite man, Steve Oedekerk. Anyway, the LA Times article ends like this: Sometimes the biggest mistake a director or actor can make is not calling in his rewrite guy. Shadyac says he didn't show Oedekerk "Dragonfly," one of the director's rare flops, until after the film was finished. "I wished," Shadyac says, "we had invited him earlier."

Now, "Dragonfly," we will all recall, is not a loud, obnoxious comedy; it's a quiet, subtle thriller starring KC, with a script originally written by Mike Thompson and Brandon Camp. Also, their original script did not look like what the film finally came out to be. There were a couple of subplots that got taken out, either in the filming or the editing. Here's a link to the review of the script that KC likely saw while he was lying on his couch. He loves subplots:

http://www.tnmc.org/dp/0404011.shtml

So, what happened to that script, which I think is better than what wound up being filmed? Perhaps Mr. Shadyac already played script doctor, possibly because Universal Studios leaned on him for a movie of less than 2 hours, possibly because he had to learn how to film a drama. Or, perhaps his bosses told him to emphasize the thriller portion. We already know that some scenes that were filmed were cut out of the movie. I believe there were also some complaints from Mr. Thompson and Mr. Camp after the movie came out that their script had been sliced. I think it's a good movie, with terrific performances from KC and the rest of the cast, but it still could have been so much better.

3 Comments:

  • At 12:17 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Hi, FlaFan... Your discovery about the Dragonfly script is very interesting. Some big changes were made between this version and what appeared on the screen. For one, Joe argues against suicide rather than being suicidal. Also, Linda Hunt's character is never mentioned, and so the whole religious side of the story is not there. Two more important differences! Leslie

     
  • At 11:02 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    I don't seem to own this movie in either VHS or DVD. It wasn't one of my favourites but I'd still like to have it in my collection. Note to self: buy it.

    I firmly believe in what this movie basically conveyed - that physical death is not the end, and that which lives on, mind/spirit (not to be confused with the body's brain), is capable of direct communication without the use of any physical form. Because it is, the over-the-top "paranormal" stuff in this movie was absurd to me. Why communicate in such indirect ways as repeatedly pulling up dragonfly symbols, fiddling with the contents of clothes closets and interfering with electric currents? People who have lost loved ones often "see" the person who has passed on right in their room, and "speak" with them. Those who are too fearful to handle such a vision will simply experience a reassurring dream, in which their loved one lets them know that everything is fine. The kind of indirect communication that was utilized in this movie... to me... made the whole idea look foolish. And it isn't.

    I agree that it could have been a better movie.

     
  • At 5:56 PM, Blogger FlaFan said…

    Here's the ultimate delayed reaction....(Just looking through old posts):

    I agree with you, Deb. I think the "thriller" element is too much emphasized here, at the expense of the spiritual and emotional that people go through. It could have been a much better drama in that sense.

     

Post a Comment

<< Home